Rozell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of rape. The punishment was assessed by the jury at 99 years.
*17The proof shows that the prosecutrix was the wife of the appellant who was charged and convicted as a principal.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. He also contends that a new trial should be granted because his co-principal was acquitted and that he could not be guilty for the rape of his wife. We affirm.
Doris Ann Rozell testified that on the night in question…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Coots v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Singletary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Elizalde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Dugger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.