Legal Opinion
Martin v. Serice
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 27, 1942No. 36534PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
Acting under Section 25 of Article VII of the Constitution, the Judges of the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit applied for instructions on the questions of law on which the case was decided by the judge of the district court.
As disclosed by the record which we ordered sent up to this court, the suit is one for the annulment of a tax sale of a tract of land, containing 20 acres, in the Parish of St. Mary. The facts are substantially as follows.
The property involved in this suit was sold to Sam Serice by the sheriff of the Parish of St. Mary for the taxes of the year 1932,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kivlen v. HorvathSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Stone v. Kimball's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Ryals v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Mire v. La Salle Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Ideal Savings & Homestead Ass'n v. YochimSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
3Cited by16 opinions
- Di Giovanni v. CortinasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Securities Mortg. Co., Inc. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Prampin v. Southern Chemical WorksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.