Legal Opinion

In re Essure Product Cases

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 2024No. A166579MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/10/24 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re ESSURE PRODUCT CASES. A166579 LHC GROUP, INC., (JCCP No. 4887) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Alameda County Super. Ct. v. No. RG16804878) BAYER CORPORATION, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Defendant and Respondent. AND DENYING REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT THE COURT: Respondent’s petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion is modified as follows: The last sentence of the first full paragraph on page 10 is deleted and replaced…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API