Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Lassiter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 8, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a declaratory judgment, the appeal is from a resettled order granting respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4), and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The action seeks to invalidate a resolution granting an area variance pursuant to subdivision (g) of section 154 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Searsdale. The action, which was commenced three years after the granting of the variance, challenges its validity mainly on the grounds…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Beckmann v. TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Gazan v. CorbettNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allan & Allan Arts Ltd. v. RosenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- A. L. W., Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Phillips v. Village of OriskanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re Courtesy Estates, Inc. v. SchermerhornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976