Johnson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge
Introduction
Antwane Johnson (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.151 for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant asserts first that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the State made during sentencing and for failing to object to the sentence itself, and second that the sentencing court's sentence was an abuse of discretion. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
A jury convicted Movant of first-degree burglary, first-degree robbery,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. NormanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Megan L. Hendricks, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- State of Missouri v. Brenda ThurmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020