Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elghanayan v. Elghanayan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1985Published

1Dissent

Carro and Milonas, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Milonas, J., as follows: In my opinion, the order being appealed herein should be modified to the extent of denying the motion to cancel the notice of pendency.

Plaintiff’s wholly owned corporation, 57-Eddy Corporation, and another entity doing business as A&N Elghanayan Associates began operation in the late 1960’s as a partnership known as 153 East 57th Street Associates. This partnership owned and operated certain property located at 153 East 57th Street in Manhattan. Pursuant to the agreement between the parties, 57-Eddy Corporation was to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braunston v. Anchorage Woods, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. General Property Corp. v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Elghanayan v. ElghanayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API