Legal Opinion

Danford v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1978No. 06 77 175, CA 9056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue raised in this petition for review of an order of the Oregon State Penitentiary Disciplinary Committee (Committee) is whether the Committee’s investigator adequately questioned other inmates as requested by petitioner.

Petitioner was charged with violating Corrections Division Rules of Prohibited Conduct, Rule 4, Assault. Oregon Administrative Rules, ch 291, § 40-050(4). He claimed he was not present at the time and place of the alleged incident and, in an effort to gather evidence supporting his alibi, he requested the Committee’s investigation to include questioning of 14…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Geddes v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Wilkerson v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palaia v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Bekins v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API