Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial, granted. Memorandum: A new trial is required in the interest of justice because of the improper and prejudicial conduct of the prosecutor. In summing up, the District Attorney improperly commented upon defendant’s silence when told of the charges against him (People v. Robinson, 13 N Y 2d 296, 301) and, upon defendant being a recipient of welfare saying: “Again, we start off with our superior fellow, Leon Moore; his wife tells us * * * that they are on welfare, and maybe he wanted to supplement that welfare allowance a little…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. People v. MaurillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. People v. . MaurillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. People v. SmaysNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WinslowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. People v. PatnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. People v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API