Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 1990No. 88-2293, 88-2481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

566 So.2d 943 (1990)

James ARMSTRONG, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 88-2293, 88-2481.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 20, 1990.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

W. SHARP, Judge.

We grant the state's motion for rehearing en banc. Accordingly, we vacate our prior opinion and issue in its place the following.

Armstrong brings two appeals: one…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Cobb; Concurrence · Dauksch.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. United States v. Billy W. Gray, Lee Andrew Fennell, Roger Lee Wright, Ronald Cecil Barker and Vance C. DyarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Rojas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Logan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Lucas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. McGee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Stallings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API