Legal Opinion · Dissent

Casto v. Long Island Rail Road

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1959Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Conway (dissenting).

We agree that the infant plaintiff having entered upon the defendant’s premises without invitation was a trespasser and that the defendant had no affirmative duty to make the place safe for him. However, there is also the rule enunciated in Ansteth v. Buffalo Ry. Co. (145 N. Y. 210) that the defendant railway’s servants upon discovering the trespasser may not willfully, improperly and unnecessarily act toward him so as to cause him injury. Thus, despite this child’s status as a trespasser, it is apparent that defendant had no privilege to commit affirmative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Sagorsky v. MalyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Stein v. PalisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Ansteth v. Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Ralff v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API