Legal Opinion

Kotlers v. Iowa Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1999No. 97-2184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

We granted respondent-appellant, Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), permission to file an interlocutory appeal. This appeal arises from the district court’s ruling that denied the DOT’s motion to dismiss based on its claim that the DOT’s revocation of petitioner Norbert A. Kotlers’ driver’s license did not constitute “agency action.” The DOT argues that it merely implemented the district court’s order to revoke petitioner’s license which did not constitute “agency action” as meant in law. We affirm the district court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss. However, we remand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Iowa Department of Transportation v. Iowa District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Tindal v. NormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Hollinrake v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Busing v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KotlersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. State of Iowa v. Louis Lee Cubbage, Jr.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
  3. State v. KotlersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API