Legal Opinion

Parker Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1960No. 38338PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

The defendant filed general and special demurrers to the petition. The special demurrers attacked the exhibit attached to the petition and designated as a statement of the alleged “account” sued on. These demurrers alleged that the exhibit did not fully and distinctly set forth the account sued on, that it was insufficient as a bill of particulars or itemization of the account sued on, and that the plaintiff had failed to set forth an itemization of the account sued on.

The exhibit, on a form which contained the name of the plaintiff printed thereon, showed “Sold to” followed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Henry Darling Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. K. & L. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Katz v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Page v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Fulton Air Service, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Rogers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Wilensky Leather Co. v. BuleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API