Parker Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
The defendant filed general and special demurrers to the petition. The special demurrers attacked the exhibit attached to the petition and designated as a statement of the alleged “account” sued on. These demurrers alleged that the exhibit did not fully and distinctly set forth the account sued on, that it was insufficient as a bill of particulars or itemization of the account sued on, and that the plaintiff had failed to set forth an itemization of the account sued on.
The exhibit, on a form which contained the name of the plaintiff printed thereon, showed “Sold to” followed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Henry Darling Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. K. & L. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Katz v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Page v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kilgore v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Fulton Air Service, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Rogers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Wilensky Leather Co. v. BuleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963