Legal Opinion

Hornady v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided October 4, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00317Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM HEATH HORNADY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-00317-JB-N ) OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On November 18, 2021, this Court entered a default judgment on liability (hereinafter, the “November 18 Order”) as a sanction against Defendant Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC (“Defendant”). (See Doc. 344). Defendant now moves this Court, before entry of the final judgment awarding damages, to reconsider the default judgment on liability, as well as the Court’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Ca 79-3781 United Artists Corporation and Walt Disney Productions v. Harold FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Adolph Coors Company v. Movement Against Racism and the KlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API