Legal Opinion

Albu v. Sweeney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959No. Docket 35, 36, Calendar 48,008, 48,009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVoelker, J.

Plaintiffs sought damages for injuries they incurred when a taxicab in which they were riding (owned and operated by defendants and .appellants Sweeney and Sabo, respectively), became involved in an accident with a passenger car owned and operated by another defendant, Kaminski. The 2 cases were consolidated for trial and appeal. At the close of plaintiffs’ proofs and again at the close of all proofs defendant-appellants Sweeney and Sabo moved for directed verdicts on the ground that the plaintiff passengers in the taxicab had failed to prove that they, the owner and driver thereof, were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gapske v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nevill v. MurdeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wood v. LentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaLone v. RashidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Obeginski v. JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. State Bank of Sandusky v. BoddyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API