Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Baumes v. Mason

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 15, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

Prohibition. Relator Caulfield is the Director of Public Welfare and relator -Baumes, his appointee, is Commissioner of Parks, in the City of St. Louis. Respondents Mason and Murphy are, respectively, judge pro tempore and regular judge of the circuit court, Division 3. Relators seek to prohibit respondents from proceeding further in an injunction suit pending in said court. To relators’ petition for prohibition is attached a copy of the pe tition in said injunction suit, which latter is made a part of the former. Both are incorporated in our writ, and respondents have made return thereto.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. State Ex Rel. Conran v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Gill v. FerrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Warde v. McQuillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Ex Parte GounisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Missey v. City of CaboolSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Schoenbacher v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API