Legal Opinion

Scanlan v. De Zavala

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1931No. 2108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

■ WALKER, J..

In cause No. 70,004, August De Zavala v. Areola Sugar Mills et al., in district court, Harris county, Tex., De Zavala was plaintiff and Areola Sugar Mills and Kate Scanlan *850were defendants. The suit was by the plaintiff against the defendants, jointly and severally, for services rendered by him in procuring a loan for Areola Sugar Mills. The trial was to a jury, and, after conclusion of the evidence, defendant Kate Scanlan moved for a peremptory instruction, which was refused. The case was then submitted to the jury against both defendants on the following special issues, answered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Allen v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Estado Land & Cattle Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Willis v. KeatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Texas Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API