Scanlan v. De Zavala
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
■ WALKER, J..
In cause No. 70,004, August De Zavala v. Areola Sugar Mills et al., in district court, Harris county, Tex., De Zavala was plaintiff and Areola Sugar Mills and Kate Scanlan *850were defendants. The suit was by the plaintiff against the defendants, jointly and severally, for services rendered by him in procuring a loan for Areola Sugar Mills. The trial was to a jury, and, after conclusion of the evidence, defendant Kate Scanlan moved for a peremptory instruction, which was refused. The case was then submitted to the jury against both defendants on the following special issues, answered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Allen v. KitchenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Estado Land & Cattle Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Willis v. KeatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Texas Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937