Legal Opinion

People v. Comella

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2012No. Docket No. 301458PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P.J.

The central issue in this case is whether, under the felony-murder statute,1 when the predicate felony is abuse of a vulnerable adult, the prosecution must prove that a defendant committed both first- and second-degree vulnerable-adult abuse.2 We hold that the prosecution must only show either offense, not both.

Defendant’s wife, Ella, died on October 11, 2009. On a number of occasions before her death she needed medical attention for a variety of injuries. On July 31, she was admitted to the Metropolitan Hospital inten*646sive care unit for a fractured hip, hemorrhagic shock, and acute renal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Hassan M Ahmad v. University of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Nieman v. CarlDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. People of Michigan v. Belinda Denise JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People of Michigan v. Darius Aramond Diaz-GaskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API