People v. Comella
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P.J.
The central issue in this case is whether, under the felony-murder statute,1 when the predicate felony is abuse of a vulnerable adult, the prosecution must prove that a defendant committed both first- and second-degree vulnerable-adult abuse.2 We hold that the prosecution must only show either offense, not both.
Defendant’s wife, Ella, died on October 11, 2009. On a number of occasions before her death she needed medical attention for a variety of injuries. On July 31, she was admitted to the Metropolitan Hospital inten*646sive care unit for a fractured hip, hemorrhagic shock, and acute renal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. PeltolaMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hassan M Ahmad v. University of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Nieman v. CarlDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- People of Michigan v. Belinda Denise JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Darius Aramond Diaz-GaskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.