Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Amoco Production Company v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CARBON COUNTY

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1994No. 93-63Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMacy, Chief Justice

I concur in the portion of the majority opinion which concerns “excess” taxes. I disagree with, and dissent from, that portion of the majority opinion which holds that Amoco is entitled to receive a tax refund because the taxes it paid were “erroneous or illegal” taxes. I do not believe that Amoco’s constitutional rights were violated. I would, therefore, affirm the district court’s decision.

This Court has ruled: “[T]ax refunds are a matter of legislative grace, and the right to such a refund does not exist in the absence of statutory authorization.” Black v. Teton County Board of County…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kelley v. RhoadsWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Oatts v. JorgensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Clay County v. Brown Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Searight Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API