Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Judge of Superior Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Writ oe Prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
March 14, 1878, Cauffman & Dinkelspeil et ah, residents of the city of Éochester in the State of New York, filed a petition in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, praying therein that Schott & Eeibish of Detroit might be adjudged bankrupts. They’also filed a petition showing that Schott & Eeibish had disposed of their property in fraud of the Bankrupt Act, and obtained thereon from *240said court a provisional warrant directed to, and which was placed in the hands of Salmon S. Matthews, the marshal of said district.
The marshal 'found in the city of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quimbo Appo v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Arnold v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
- People v. S. S. SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- People ex. rel. Mabley v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Allard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Nichols v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Long v. KeyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Wells v. Montcalm Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Czuprynski v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.