Coltrain v. Dennis Simmons Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Connor, J., at September Term,. 1913, of MARTIN.
1Opinion of the Court
Cuaek, 0. J.
This is an action of trespass, and. to recover possession of land.' Both parties claim under a common source of title. It is admitted that the plaintiffs are owners of the first two tracts of land described in the deed from Biggs and Jones, trustees, to W. H. and Exum Carstarphen, by virtue of the deed to them from the heirs of the said Oarstarphens.
The sole question at issue is whether the deed from the Cars-tarphen heirs to H. A. Coltrain embraced the third or 50-acre tract of land described in the deed from said trustees. All the evidence is to the fact that the 50-acre tract…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Aman v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Bradshaw v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Bachelor v. . NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914