Legal Opinion

In re New York Stock Exhange Arbitration Between Barbier & Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 3, 1991No. 1420, Docket 91-7070PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Ward, J.) 752 F.Supp. 151, confirming an award of compensatory and punitive damages on claims of unauthorized trading against respondent, Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., as successor in interest to Shear-son Lehman Brothers, Inc., and respondent-appellant, Roger E. Bendelac. The arbitration proceedings arose out of a dispute involving accounts maintained by Marco Barbier, Silvana Barbier and Stefania Bar-bier, petitioners-appellees, with the brokerage house of Shearson Lehman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,103 Ostano Commerzanstalt and Dr. Herbert Jovy v. Telewide Systems, Inc., and Bernard L. SchubertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re Tampa Chain Company, Inc., Debtor. Barbara Balaber-Strauss, as Trustee Tampa Chain Company, Inc., Plaintiff v. Wolf Reichard and Leslie BlondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,246, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,295 in the Matter of New York Stock Exchange Arbitration Between Marco Barbier Silvana Barbier and Stefania Barbier, and Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. And Roger E. Bendelac, Roger E. BendelacCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API