Legal Opinion

United States v. Portrait of Wally

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 19, 2000No. 99 CIV. 9940 (MBM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

MUKASEY, District Judge.

Defendant in rem Portrait of Wally, a painting by Egon Schiele (“the painting”), was brought into the United States to be shown at the Museum of Modern Art (“MoMA”), on loan from an Austrian museum, Leopold Museum-Privatsiftung (“the Leopold”). The United States claims that the painting is stolen, and seeks its forfeiture under 19 U.S.C. § 1595a(c) (1994) and 22 U.S.C. § 401(a) (1994). The Leopold moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, I find that under controlling law, the painting…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Altmann v. Republic of AustriaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
  2. United States v. Portrait of WallyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. United States v. One Lucite Ball Containing Lunar MaterialDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  4. Republic of Turkey v. Christie's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API