United States v. Portrait of Wally
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Defendant in rem Portrait of Wally, a painting by Egon Schiele (“the painting”), was brought into the United States to be shown at the Museum of Modern Art (“MoMA”), on loan from an Austrian museum, Leopold Museum-Privatsiftung (“the Leopold”). The United States claims that the painting is stolen, and seeks its forfeiture under 19 U.S.C. § 1595a(c) (1994) and 22 U.S.C. § 401(a) (1994). The Leopold moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, I find that under controlling law, the painting…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Altmann v. Republic of AustriaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- United States v. Portrait of WallyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. One Lucite Ball Containing Lunar MaterialDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Republic of Turkey v. Christie's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019