Vennum v. Holmberg
Supreme Court of Colorado
.Error, to Pueblo District Court — Hon. J. E. Rizer, Judge. ...
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
*307March 17, 1905, the plaintiff in error instituted this action against the defendants in error, Holmberg and Scott; the latter was not served with process; Mr. Holmberg defends alone. The action was to recover $869.50, being the amount of a judgment previously secured by the plaintiff against the defendants, in the circuit court of Ford County, Illinois, a court of general jurisdiction of that state. The defendant, Holmberg, interposed several defenses. On motion of the plaintiff, all of his answer, except the. first defense (which was a denial of the allegations of the complaint) was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Little v. DyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Blake v. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Keith v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Coe v. HallamIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDade v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Gedeon v. GedeonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- S. M. Kirbens, Assignee v. Harvey WodisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Whittier v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Sarchet v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938