Legal Opinion

Vennum v. Holmberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1911No. 6586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

.Error, to Pueblo District Court — Hon. J. E. Rizer, Judge. ...

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

*307March 17, 1905, the plaintiff in error instituted this action against the defendants in error, Holmberg and Scott; the latter was not served with process; Mr. Holmberg defends alone. The action was to recover $869.50, being the amount of a judgment previously secured by the plaintiff against the defendants, in the circuit court of Ford County, Illinois, a court of general jurisdiction of that state. The defendant, Holmberg, interposed several defenses. On motion of the plaintiff, all of his answer, except the. first defense (which was a denial of the allegations of the complaint) was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Little v. DyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Blake v. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  4. Keith v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Coe v. HallamIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDade v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Gedeon v. GedeonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. S. M. Kirbens, Assignee v. Harvey WodisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. Whittier v. RileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Sarchet v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API