Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Ripley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Vigo Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

It would serve no useful purpose to state *509the questions which the appellant attempts to present in this case any further than to say that they all depend upon the bills of exceptions. The objection to their consideration is made by the appellee, that the bills of exceptions are not properly in the record. Ninety days were given by the court in which to file the bills of exceptions, and it is not shown when they were filed. It has often been decided by this court that in such cases the record must show affirmatively that the bills of exceptions were filed within the time allowed. Warner v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Port v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Warner v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Stivers v. McConnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirby v. BowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Posey v. ScalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Schoonover v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API