Legal Opinion · Dissent

Michalek v. United States Gypsum Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 1935No. 288Published

1DissentAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

Whether the causes of action arose when the plaintiff inhaled silica dust particles, during the term of his employment by the defendant, or only when the disease of silicosis developed as the result of inhaling, is not an easy question to answer. But I believe that we are justified in following the decision of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in Conklin v. Draper, 229 App. Div. 227, 241 N. Y. S. 529, affirmed in 254 N. Y. 620; 173 N. E. 892, and regarding the last date of inhaling the silica dust as the time from which the statute runs for those causes of action that are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Amberg v. . KinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Sharrow v. . Inland Lines, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API