Legal Opinion · Dissent

McKelvy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 11, 1973No. 357-71; No. 358-71Published

1DissentSkeltoN, Judge

I respectfully disagree with the opinion of the court in this case. The court has restricted itself to what it describes as the “sole question” and the “narrow question” of whether the April 12, 1969, transaction was a taxable dividend 'to the extent of earnings and profits of McKelvy Furniture, Inc., in the sum of $14,378.80 for its fiscal year ending January 31, 1970. In so limiting its opinion, the court has erred. Such question is “narrow,” indeed, but it is not the “sole” question in the case. This restriction of the court’s decision to this isolated transaction leaves many questions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Wiese v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Lockhart v. Van AlstyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API