United States v. Rivera-Calderon
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s, José A. RiveraCalderón, Motion for Court to Declare the Sentencing Reform Act’s Mandatory Provisions, 18 ' U.S.C. § 8553(b) Unconstitutional and for Further Remedy as a Result Thereof (Docket No. 168). Defendant requests the Court to declare the effect of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) over certain mandatory provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act. Defendant sustains that the Supreme Court’s decision declaring the Washington’s guidelines unconstitutional applies to…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garcia v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Browne v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Delgado-Vazquez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Feliciano-Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015