Legal Opinion
Bank of Beaverton v. Godwin
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1828PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendants base their contention upon a rule of court which had theretofore been adopted by the Circuit Court of Washington County, and which, if valid, was in force and effect at the time the proceeding under review was had. That rule reads:
“Rule 4. Time for answer or reply or for filing demurrers or motions or amended pleadings shall not be extended for a longer period than ten days after expiration of the time fixed by statute, and the court will not recognize any stipulation of counsel extending such time beyond such limit unless the sanction of the court is obtained prior to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Oxman v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Coyote G. & S. M. Co. v. RubleOregon Supreme Court · 1881
- Bratt v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Schnitzer v. SteinOregon Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burke v. RachauOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Brown v. BeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Burke v. RachauOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Hansen v. BussmanOregon Supreme Court · 1979