Legal Opinion

State v. Wellman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Minneapolis, adjudging him guilty of the larceny of five thousand feet of illuminating gas, and imposing a fine of $50 and costs. The action was tried by the court, a jury being waived.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant was charged with the larceny of a quantity of illuminating gas of the value of $12.50, and the question here is whether the evidence justified his conviction. That illuminating gas may be the subject of a larceny cannot admit of a doubt. Regina v. White, 6 Cox, Cr. Cas. 213; Com. v. Shaw, 4 Allen, 308.

That a larceny was committed in this case by some one is undisputed. It was committed by connecting, with a piece of lead pipe, the two arms of the service-pipe at the place where the meter had been detached, and then turning the stop-cock so as to allow the gas to pass through the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Selman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Woods v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Runck v. CloudOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API