Legal Opinion

Corenevsky v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1984No. Docket Nos. L.A. 31723, 31724, 31722Published

1Opinion of the Court

36 Cal.3d 307 (1984)

682 P.2d 360

204 Cal. Rptr. 165

ROBERT CORENEVSKY, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IMPERIAL COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. In re DAVID A. TITSWORTH, as Auditor-Controller, etc., on Habeas Corpus.

Docket Nos. L.A. 31723, 31724, 31722.

Supreme Court of California.

July 5, 1984.

COUNSEL

Ephraim Margolin, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Nicholas C. Arguimbau, Sandra Coliver, Steven E. Feldman, Edward Zinter, Public Defender, George Siddell and Walter Lundstein, Deputy Public Defenders, Thomas M. Fries and James H. Harmon, County Counsel, Steven D.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API