In Re Zuker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.
Habeas corpus.
In this matter, it appears that in a proceeding supplementary to the execution of a judgment, on a hearing thereof before a referee appointed by the superior court, both Han nah Zuker and James M. Zuker were sworn and testified; that in so doing, each of such witnesses testified to certain facts, as to which several other witnesses in effect testified to the contrary; also, that as to petitioner James M. Zuker, after having been orally ordered by the referee to produce certain books and records, he failed to do so; that thereupon, in pursuance of an affidavit made in the nature…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re BattelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946