Legal Opinion
In re Corey L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
As the Corporation Counsel concedes, the guilty plea allocution conducted at the fact-finding hearing on which the challenged order was based was inadequate inasmuch as the Family Court failed to comprehensively apprise the appellant of his various constitutional and statutory rights or of the consequences of a waiver thereof (see, People v Gina M. M., 40 NY2d 595; Matter of Kenny A., 125 AD2d 464; Matter of Yolanda C., 118 AD2d 778; Matter of Schlena P., 98 AD2d 750; Matter of Randy H., 91 AD2d 685). Reversal is, therefore, mandated. Moreover, since the appellant’s placement period has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. Gina M. M.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re Yolanda C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re Patrick R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re Randy H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re SchlenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Edgar Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Anthony D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re James D. H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Joseph P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re David B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.