Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Berryhill

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 13, 2018No. 0:17-cv-01650Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roxann Louise Anderson, Case No. 17-cv-1650 (SER) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. STEVEN E. RAU, United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Roxann Louise Anderson (“Anderson”) seeks review of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). See (Am. Compl.) [Doc. No. 3]. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (Mot.) [Doc. No. 13]; (Def.’s Mot. for Summ.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Moore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Titus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Ruben Gonzales v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Jones v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API