People v. Atencio

NEY ** , J.

Defendant, Michael I. Atencio, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding him guilty of unlawful possession of more than twenty-five grams of a schedule II controlled substance with intent to distribute, resisting arrest, and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm.

I

Defendant first argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he possessed a schedule II controlled substance. We disagree.

The controlled substances statute provides, in relevant part, as follows:(1)(a) ... [I]t is unlawful for any person knowingly to ...…