Legal Opinion

Madaras v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1985No. WCB No. 83-07509; CA A34544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks reversal of a Board order which reversed the referee’s determination that claimant is permanently and totally disabled for the reason that she has made no attempt to seek work, as required by ORS 656.206(3). SAIF argues that, because claimant is not totally disabled from a physical standpoint, she should be required to seek work to confirm her unemployability, unless the evidence of unemployability is clear and convincing. SAIF concedes that claimant has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would be futile for her to seek work. That is all that is required. See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Compensation of MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. SchollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API