Legal Opinion

Smith v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided November 3, 2015No. Docket Nos. 22033-12, 29621-12UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARK R. SMITH AND YONG N. SMITH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Smith v. Comm'r

Docket Nos. 22033-12, 29621-12.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2015-214; 2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 222;

November 3, 2015, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

Mark R. Smith, Pro se.

Bryant W. Smith, for respondent.

HAINES, Judge.

HAINES

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAINES, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax and penalties as follows:

Penalty

Year

Deficiency

sec. 6662(a)

2009

S13,732

$2,746

2010

6,098

1,219

After concessions, we must decide…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Tokarski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ugorji Timothy Wilson Onyeani v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API