Oppenheimer v. San Antonio Land & Irrigation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; W. R. Smith, Judge. Ancillary suit in equity by Floyd McGown, as receiver of the San Antonio Rand & Irrigation Company, Rimited, against Jesse D. Oppenheimer, Abraham Rang, and Isaac Rang. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; W. R. Smith, Judge. Ancillary suit in equity by Floyd McGown, as receiver of the San Antonio Rand & Irrigation Company, Rimited, against Jesse D. Oppenheimer, Abraham Rang, and Isaac Rang. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal. Under a decree of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, entered in a suit brought in that court by the Empire Trust Company, trustee in a deed of trust securing bonds issued by the San Antonio Land & Irrigation Company, Limited, against the…
1Opinion of the CourtWarker, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). When the appellants brought their suit in the state court for the recovery of *935land, or, in the alternative, for the foreclosure of a lien thereon, that land was in the custody of the United States District Court, being in the possession of its receiver appointed in a suit previously brought therein, in which suit the foreclosure of an asserted lien on that land was sought and had been decreed. .Possession of that land by the United States court was necessary to the exercise of its jurisdiction. An effect of its so talcing possession was a withdrawal of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of Western Reserve UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Julian v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Empire Trust Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ackerman v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- McClelland v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
- Barnett v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- CTC Inv. Co. v. Daniel Boone Coal CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.