Legal Opinion

Shale v. Rourke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 14, 1919No. 10875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

^royles, C. J.

1. It is the duty of counsel for the plaintiff in error to present to the presiding judge for his certificate a true bill of exceptions, and it is his further duty, where the judge refuses to certify the bill of exceptions tendered him but fails to give in writing his objections thereto, to request the judge to endorse upon the hill of exceptions his reasons for his refusal; and if the judge fails to do so, then the matter should be brought to the attention of this court. Coleman v. Johnson, 45 Ga. 317; Vason v. Gardner, 70 Ga. 517.

*285Decided October 14, 1919. Application for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vason & Davis v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Coleman v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fouts v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API