Legal Opinion

District 65, Distributive, Processing & Office Workers Union v. McKague

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 10208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

The question before the court arises out of defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs' Bill of Complaint, Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.

The question was originally argued before my late associate, The Honorable William Alvah Stewart, but no conclusion or adjudication was entered prior to his death.

Written stipulation had been executed by counsel for the parties wherein it has been agreed the court shall consider the question presented without additional hearing, and no useful purpose could be served by further argument or presentation.

Certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Moeller v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Howard v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Metzger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. District 65, Distributive, Processing and Office Workers Union of New York and New Jersey, Formerly Local 65 v. McKagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. District 65, Distributive, Processing and Office Workers Union of New York and New Jersey, Formerly Local 65 v. McKagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API