Legal Opinion
Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. R. Salzstein & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, J. P.
Conforti & Bisele, Inc. (hereinafter "Conforti”) brought this proceeding pursuant to sections 75 and 76 *293of the Lien Law for an order vacating the demand for a verified statement served by R. Salzstein & Co., Inc. (hereinafter "Salzstein”). Salzstein cross-moved to dismiss Conforti’s petition on the ground it did not state a cause of action.
Conforti, the general contractor, and Salzstein, the electrical subcontractor, entered into a subcontract with regard to the construction of the Carlton Park apartment building. To the extent here relevant, article 4 of that subcontract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Constr. Co., Ltd. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Allerton Construction Corp. v. Fairway Apartments Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Fontaine Bleau Swimming Pool Corp. v. Aquarama Swimming Pool Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pronti v. BellettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Primiano Construction Co. v. Ferran Concrete Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- David B. Lee & Co. v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- P. M. Excavating, Inc. v. Matthews Industrial Piping Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985