Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 4, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Darlington, August, 1897. Foreclosure, Emiline Sweet v. D. H. Gilmore. The following is so much of the Circuit decree as is necessary to understand the issues on appeal: This is an action for the foreclosure of two mortgages, given by the defendant, Gilmore, to the plaintiff — the first to secure a bond for $6,000, dated August 19th, 1886, and the second to secure a bond for $750, dated February 7th, 1888. The two mortgages cover substantially the same…

Read the full summary

Before Klugh, J., Darlington, August, 1897. Foreclosure, Emiline Sweet v. D. H. Gilmore. The following is so much of the Circuit decree as is necessary to understand the issues on appeal: This is an action for the foreclosure of two mortgages, given by the defendant, Gilmore, to the plaintiff — the first to secure a bond for $6,000, dated August 19th, 1886, and the second to secure a bond for $750, dated February 7th, 1888. The two mortgages cover substantially the same property. * * * The second and main point of difference between the parties is as to certain payments which the defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The facts of this case are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge Klugh. The defendant appealed from said decree upon exceptions, which raise practically but two questions, the first of which is whether the Circuit Judge erred in not sustaining the objection to the testimony as to the immoral connections of the defendant and other witnesses who testified in his behalf, which was introduced for the purpose of showing that the defendant and his other witnesses were not'worthy of belief. .

*5351 *534When a witness is examined for the purpose…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KnoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. State v. BolinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. DeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. GilstrapSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  5. Bistrick v. University of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API