Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Fermin, Hector Fermin, and Freddy Fermin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 11, 1994No. 294, 295 and 1178, Dockets 93-1167, 93-1267 and 93-1731PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Defendants Freddy Fermín (“Freddy”), Juan Fermín (“Juan”), and Hector Fermín (“Hector”) appeal from judgments of conviction and sentences on various narcotics and firearm offenses entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Louis J. Freeh, Judge). On appeal, each defendant asserts that the District Court committed legal errors in pretrial procedure, trial rulings, or sentencing determinations. We conclude that none of the asserted errors justifies a new trial for any defendant, though we disapprove or question certain…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Lai-Moi Leung and Seow Ming ChoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. ZagariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Cory Spears v. Charles GreinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. ZagariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. DamatoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API