Legal Opinion
Worth Steel Corporation v. Gartman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 28, 1962No. 16351PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Clarence E. Gartman, plaintiff, brought a common law suit for personal injury damages against defendant Worth Steel Corporation. Intervening in the suit was a Workmen’s Compensation insurance company which was subrogated to a portion of Gartman’s right to recover damages, if any, by suit against 'the defendant. This intervenor may be disregarded in our discussion.
Trial was to a jury, and upon its verdict judgment was entered against the defendant Worth Steel Corporation. From this judgment appeal was perfected.
Judgment reversed. Cause remanded for another trial.
At the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Chekanski v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Nalle v. EavesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Holland v. Foley Brothers Dry Goods CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robertson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- LeBlanc, Inc. v. Gulf Bitulithic CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Walker v. S & T Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Taylor v. Trans-Continental Properties, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1987
- English v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.