Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Nabors Drilling USA

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 2007No. CA 06-543PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

This workers’ compensation case, where the Commission held that Russell Weaver had failed to prove his injury was compensable, presents the issue of the meaning of the term “specific incident” as found in Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(4). We affirm the decision of the Commission.

Weaver began working for appellee, Nabors Drilling, in December 2004. On either March 3 or 4, 2005, he complained that his hands were “tingling” and “burning” while he was “mixing mud” for his job. At the hearing, he stated that he was “picking up a sack of mud and carrying it a few feet” when he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edens v. Superior Marble & GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Daniels v. Affiliated Foods SouthwestCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Kimble v. Labor Force, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Pearson v. WorksourceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Mack-Reynolds Appraisal Co. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Mineral Springs School District and Arkansas School Boards Association v. Margaret MacOnCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API