Legal Opinion

Funk v. Payne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1938No. 28085PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order confirming sheriff’s sale after foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. The statement of the proceedings is incomplete and the record of the proceedings is not abstracted as required by rule 15 of this court. By reference to the record itself it is found that the sale was confirmed over the objection of the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below, on February 26, 1937.

The plaintiffs in error present two assignments of error. The first is that the court erred in not granting the defendants a jury trial. This court has many times held that the only question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burton v. MeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Booth v. First State Bank of MaramecSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Kline v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Wyant v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Charles Sanders Homes, Inc. v. Cook & Associates, Engineering, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. CHARLES SANDERS HOMES v. COOK & ASSOCIATESCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API