Legal Opinion

Amatulli v. Sweeney

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act (in the nature of mandamus) whereby the petitioner, a Water and Light Commissioner of the Village *325of Freeport seeks to review a determination of the Village Board which had the effect of declaring the Board of Commissioners of which petitioner was a member to have been illegally constituted. Petitioner seeks an order declaring: (1) the Board of Commissioners to have been legally constituted on April 4, 1955; (2) restraining the respondents from giving effect to their action taken on September 18, 1961, whereby another “ Board of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felice v. SwezeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Steward v. RustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gerzof v. SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Gerzof v. SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Daly v. EaganNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Amatulli v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Gerzof v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API