Legal Opinion
Peardon v. Chapman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 1948No. 9636PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, circuit judge.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice for lack of prosecution.
The action was instituted in December, 194S. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. The complaint alleges that appellant and defendants-appellees, Chapman and Laford, are members of a co-partnership, Navigation Instrument Company, under written articles of co-partnership dated May 1, 1942. The purpose of Navigation was the development and promotion of an invention by defendant-appellee Peardon for the detection of torpedoes. Peardon is the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Refior v. Lansing Drop Forge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Olsen v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Facer Forged Steel Car Wheel & Locomotive Wheel Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Dauphinee v. American Range Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Richard Harris v. Julius Cuyler, Superintendent, and Edmund J. Gaffney, M.DCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bolten v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Joel S. Abel v. American Art Analog, Inc. And Michael D. Zellman and Philip Cohen. Appeal of American Art Analog, Inc. And Philip CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.