Legal Opinion

Ebinger v. Venus Construction Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 2011No. 2010-C-2516PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKimball, C.J.

| tin this dispute over alleged defects in the construction of a new home, the issue before this Court is whether the construction company’s third-party demand against a subcontractor is time-barred. The resolution of this issue depends primarily upon the application of La. R.S. 9:2772, which establishes a peremptive period for actions against residential building contractors. This peremptive period was established originally at ten years, but subsequent amendments have shortened its duration twice. A 1999 amendment reduced the period to seven years; a 2003 amendment reduced it to five years.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Lott v. HaleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  5. Owens v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Jessie M. Griffin, IISupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  2. Thrasher Construction, Inc. v. Gibbs Residential, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Faulk v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. Crescent Property Partners, LLC v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  5. Crescent Property Partners, LLC v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API