Legal Opinion

Jalloh v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 29, 2015No. 13-2645Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

13-2645 Jalloh v. Holder BIA Sichel, IJ A095 841 077 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CORRECTED SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Azmond Ali v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Redondo-Borges v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API