Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K. D. R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1979No. 1538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a child custody case pursuant to an instructed verdict. Lloyd Donald Stewart and Mary Jane Stewart were plaintiffs in the trial co.urt and appellants in this Court, and Margaret Suzanne Rouse Baruday was defendant in the trial court and is appellee in this Court. Judgment was rendered that the plaintiffs take nothing by their suit. The parties will be designated as “plaintiffs” and “defendant” as they were in the trial court.

Since this is a suit to determine custody of a child, the paramount issue is the best interest of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Herrera v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Brokenleg v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Victoria National Bank v. Briones, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  2. Avalos v. MejiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API